Abstract
Purpose
The goal of breast cancer surgery is to remove all of the cancer with a minimum of normal tissue, but absence of full 3-dimensional information on the specimen makes this difficult to achieve.
Method
Micro-CT is a high resolution, X-ray, 3D imaging method, widely used in industry but rarely in medicine.
Results
We imaged and analyzed 173 partial mastectomies (129 ductal carcinomas, 14 lobular carcinomas, 28 DCIS). Imaging was simple and rapid. The size and shape of the cancers seen on Micro-CT closely matched the size and shape of the cancers seen at specimen dissection. Micro-CT images of multicentric/multifocal cancers revealed multiple non-contiguous masses. Micro-CT revealed cancer touching the specimen edge for 93% of the 114 cases judged margin positive by the pathologist, and 28 of the cases not seen as margin positive on pathological analysis; cancer occupied 1.55% of surface area when both the pathologist and Micro-CT suggested cancer at the edge, but only 0.45% of surface area for the “Micro-CT-Only-Positive Cases”. Thus, Micro-CT detects cancers that touch a very small region of the specimen surface, which is likely to be missed on sectioning.
Conclusions
Micro-CT provides full 3D images of breast cancer specimens, allowing one to identify, in minutes rather than hours, while the patient is in OR, margin-positive cancers together with information on where the cancer touches the edge, in a fashion more accurate than possible from the histology slides alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Isaacs AJ, Gemignani ML, Pusic A, Sedrakyan A (2016) Association of breast conservation surgery for cancer with 90-day reoperation rates in New York state. JAMA Surg 151(7):648–655
Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, Lapin B, Liederbach E, Winchester DP, Yao K (2014) Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg 149(12):1296–1305
Vrieling C, van Werkhoven E, Maingon P, Poortmans P, Weltens C, Fourquet A, Schinagl D, Oei B, Rodenhuis CC, Horiot JC, Struikmans H, Van Limbergen E, Kirova Y, Elkhuizen P, Bongartz R, Miralbell R, Morgan DA, Dubois JB, Remouchamps V, Mirimanoff RO, Hart G, Collette S, Collette L, Bartelink H (2017) European organisation for research and treatment of cancer, radiation oncology and breast cancer groups Prognostic factors for local control in breast cancer after long-term follow-up in the EORTC Boost vs No Boost Trial: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 3(1):42–48
Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Dixon JM, Irwig L, Brennan ME, Solin LJ (2010) Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer 18:3219–3232
Braunstein LZ, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Salama L, Capuco A, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Punglia RS, MacDonald SM, Harris JR (2017) Breast-cancer subtype, age, and lymph node status as predictors of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161(1):173–179
Mihalcik SA, Rawal B, Braunstein LZ, Capuco A, Wong JS, Punglia RS, Bellon JR, Harris JR (2017) The impact of reexcision and residual disease on local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 24(7):1868–1873
Vos EL, Gaal J, Verhoef C, Brouwer K, van Deurzen CHM, Koppert LB (2017) Focally positive margins in breast conserving surgery: predictors, residual disease, and local recurrence. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(10):1846–1854
Bodilsen A, Bjerre K, Offersen BV, Vahl P, Ejlertsen B, Overgaard J, Christiansen P (2015) The influence of repeat surgery and residual disease on recurrence after breast-conserving surgery: a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study. Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S476–S485
Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Silverstein M, Cheongsiatmoy JA, Mihm MV Jr, Sober AJ, Tanabe KK, Smith BL, Younger J (2009) Why cancer at the primary site and in the nodes contributes to the risk of cancer death. Cancer 115(21):5084–5094
EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group), McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane F, Ewertz M, Gray R, Mannu G, Peto R, Whelan T, Wang Y, Wang Z, Darby S (2014) Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet 383(9935):2127–2135
Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M (2014) Society of surgical oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):704–716
Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR, Horton J, Hwang S, Johnson PL, Marinovich ML, Schnitt SJ, Wapnir I, Moran MS (2016) Society of surgical oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in Ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 34(33):4040–4046
St John ER, Al-Khudairi R, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Takats Z, Hadjiminas DJ, Darzi A, Leff DR (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative techniques for margin assessment in breast cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 265(2):300–310
Leff DR, St John ER, Takats Z (2017) Reducing the margins of error during breast-conserving surgery: disruptive technologies or traditional disruptions? JAMA Surg 152(6):517–518
St John ER, Balog J, McKenzie JS, Rossi M, Covington A, Muirhead L, Bodai Z, Rosini F, Speller AVM, Shousha S, Ramakrishnan R, Darzi A, Takats Z, Leff DR (2017) Rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry of electrosurgical vapours for the identification of breast pathology: towards an intelligent knife for breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res 19(1):59
Thill M, Baumann K, Barinoff J (2014) Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conservative surgery–still in use? J Surg Oncol 110(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23634
Brachtel EF, Johnson NB, Huck AE, Rice-Stitt TL, Vangel MG, Smith BL, Tearney GJ, Kang D (2016) Spectrally encoded confocal microscopy for diagnosing breast cancer in excision and margin specimens. Lab Invest 96(4):459–467
Coble J, Reid V (2017) Achieving clear margins Directed shaving using MarginProbe, as compared to a full cavity shave approach. Am J Surg 213(4):627–630
Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Jakub JW, Degnim AC, Grant CS, Farley DR, Thomsen KM, Osborn JB, Keeney GL, Habermann EB (2014) Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Surgery 156(1):190–197
Zysk AM, Chen K, Gabrielson E, Tafra L, May Gonzalez EA, Canner JK, Schneider EB, Cittadine AJ, Scott Carney P, Boppart SA, Tsuchiya K, Sawyer K, Jacobs LK (2015) Intraoperative assessment of final margins with a handheld optical imaging probe during breast-conserving surgery may reduce the reoperation rate: results of a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3356–3362
de Boer LL, Hendriks BH, van Duijnhoven F, Peeters-Baas MT, Van de Vijver K, Loo CE, Jóźwiak K, Sterenborg HJ, Ruers TJ (2016) Using DRS during breast conserving surgery: identifying robust optical parameters and influence of inter-patient variation. Biomed Opt Express 7(12):5188–5200
Wong TTW, Zhang R, Hai P, Zhang C, Pleitez MA, Aft RL, Novack DV, Wang LV (2017) Fast label-free multilayered histology-like imaging of human breast cancer by photoacoustic microscopy. Sci Adv 3(5):e1602168
Diment J, Guterman A, Shapiro M, Peles Z, Maishar R, Gur A, Kolka E, Brem R (2016) An intraoperative MRI system for margin assessment in breast conserving surgery: initial results from a novel technique. J Surg Oncol 114(1):22–26
Chagpar AB, Butler M, Killelea BK, Horowitz NR, Stavris K, Lannin DR, Papa M, Allweis T, Karni T, Sandbank J, Konichezky M (2015) Does three-dimensional intraoperative specimen imaging reduce the need for re-excision in breast cancer patients? A prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 210(5):886–890
Clarke GM, Holloway CM, Zubovits JT, Nofech-Mozes S, Liu K, Murray M, Wang D, Yaffe MJ (2016) Whole-mount pathology of breast lumpectomy specimens improves detection of tumour margins and focality. Histopathology 69(1):35–44
Chang TP, Leff DR, Shousha S, Hadjiminas DJ, Ramakrishnan R, Hughes MR, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2015) Imaging breast cancer morphology using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: towards a real-time intraoperative imaging tool for cavity scanning. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153(2):299–310
Tao YK, Shen D, Sheikine Y, Ahsen OO, Wang HH, Schmolze DB, Johnson NB, Brooker JS, Cable AE, Connolly JL, Fujimoto JG (2014) Assessment of breast pathologies using nonlinear microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(43):15304–15309
Brown JQ, Bydlon TM, Kennedy SA, Caldwell ML, Gallagher JE, Junker M, Wilke LG, Barry WT, Geradts J, Ramanujam N (2013) Optical spectral surveillance of breast tissue landscapes for detection of residual disease in breast tumor margins. PLoS ONE 8(7):e69906
Assayag O, Antoine M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Riben M, Harms F, Burcheri A, Grieve K, Dalimier E, Conte Le, de Poly B, Boccara C (2014) Large field, high resolution full-field optical coherence tomography: a pre-clinical study of human breast tissue and cancer assessment. Technol Cancer Res Treat 13(5):455–468
Nguyen FT, Zysk AM, Chaney EJ, Kotynek JG, Oliphant UJ, Bellafiore FJ, Rowland KM, Johnson PA, Boppart SA (2009) Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography. Cancer Res 69(22):8790–8796
Amer HA, Schmitzberger F, Ingold-Heppner B, Kussmaul J, El Tohamy MF, Tantawy HI, Hamm B, Makowski M, Fallenberg EM (2017) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography? Eur J Radiol 93:258–264
Miller CL, Coopey SB, Rafferty E, Gadd M, Smith BL, Specht MC (2016) Comparison of intra-operative specimen mammography to standard specimen mammography for excision of non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155(3):513–519
Hisada T, Sawaki M, Ishiguro J, Adachi Y, Kotani H, Yoshimura A, Hattori M, Yatabe Y, Iwata H (2016) Impact of intraoperative specimen mammography on margins in breast-conserving surgery. Mol Clin Oncol 5(3):269–272
van Bommel AC, Spronk PE, Vrancken Peeters MT, Jager A, Lobbes M, Maduro JH, Mureau MA, Schreuder K, Smorenburg CH, Verloop J, Westenend PJ, Wouters MW, Siesling S, Tjan-Heijnen VC, van Dalen T, NABON Breast Cancer Audit (2017) Clinical auditing as an instrument for quality improvement in breast cancer care in the Netherlands: the national NABON Breast Cancer Audit. J Surg Oncol 115(3):243–249
Smith BL, Gadd MA, Lanahan CR, Rai U, Tang R, Rice-Stitt T, Merrill AL, Strasfeld DB, Ferrer JM, Brachtel EF, Specht MC (2018) BuReal-time, intraoperative detection of residual breast cancer in lumpectomy cavity walls using a novel cathepsin-activated fluorescent imaging system. Breast Cancer Res Treat 171(2):413–420
Haloua MH, Volders JH, Krekel NM, Lopes Cardozo AM, de Roos WK, de Widt-Levert LM, van der Veen H, Rijna H, Bergers E, Jóźwiak K, Meijer S, van den Tol P (2016) Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT). Ann Surg Oncol 23(1):30–37
Theunissen CI, Rust EA, Edens MA, Bandel C, Ooster-van V, den Berg JG, Jager PL, Noorda EM, Francken AB (2017) Radioactive seed localization is the preferred technique in nonpalpable breast cancer compared with wire-guided localization and radioguided occult lesion localization. Nucl Med Commun 38(5):396–401
Langhans L, Tvedskov TF, Klausen TL, Jensen MB, Talman ML, Vejborg I, Benian C, Roslind A, Hermansen J, Oturai PS, Bentzon N, Kroman N (2017) Radioactive seed localization or wire-guided localization of nonpalpable invasive and in situ breast cancer: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial. Ann Surg 266(1):29–35
Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, Yao X, Bossuyt V, Harigopal M, Lannin DR, Pusztai L, Horowitz NR (2015) A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(6):503–510
Wang K, Ren Y, He J (2017) Cavity shaving plus lumpectomy versus lumpectomy alone for patients with breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0168705
Tang SS et al (2017) Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland. Eur J Cancer 84:315–324
Morrow M, Abrahamse P, Hofer TP, Ward KC, Hamilton AS, Kurian AW, Katz SJ, Jagsi R (2017) Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management. JAMA Oncol 3(10):1352–1357
Butler-Henderson K, Lee AH, Price RI, Waring K (2014) Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving therapy: a systematic review. Breast 23(2):112–119
Chan BK, Wiseberg-Firtell JA, Jois RH, Jensen K, Audisio RA (2015) Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009206.pub2
Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Garvey E, Blair S (2018) Intraoperative margin management in breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 25(1):18–27
O'Kelly Priddy CM, Forte VA, Lang JE (2016) The importance of surgical margins in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 113(3):256–263
Tang R, Buckley JM, Fernandez L, Coopey S, Aftreth O, Michaelson J, Saksena M, Lei L, Specht M, Gadd M, Yagi Y, Rafferty E, Brachtel E, Smith BL (2013) Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT): a novel approach for intraoperative breast cancer specimen imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139(2):311–316
Tang R, Coopey SB, Buckley JM, Aftreth OP, Fernandez LJ, Brachtel EF, Michaelson JS, Gadd MA, Specht MC, Koerner FC, Smith BL (2013) A pilot study evaluating shaved cavity margins with micro-computed tomography: a novel method for predicting lumpectomy margin status intraoperatively. Breast J 19(5):485–489
Sarraj WM, Tang R, Najjar AJ, Griffin M, Zambeli-Ljepovic A, Senter-Zapata M, Ly A, Brachtel E, Aftreth O, Gilbertson J, Yagi Y, Gadd M, Hughes KS, Smith BL, Michaelson JS (2015) Prediction of primary breast cancer size and t- stage using micro computed tomography (Micro-CT) in lumpectomy specimens. J Pathol Inform 6:60
Senter-Zapata M, Patel K, Bautista P, Griffin M, Michaelson JS, Yagi Y (2016) The role of micro-ct in 3D histology imaging. Pathobiology 83:140–147
Tang R, Saksena M, Coopey SB, Fernandez L, Buckley JM, Lei L, Aftreth O, Koerner F, Michaelson J, Rafferty E, Brachtel E, Smith BL (2016) Intraoperative micro-computed tomography: a novel method for determination of primary tumor dimensions in breast cancer specimens. Br J Radiol 89:2015
Ligthart ST, Coumans FA, Bidard FC, Simkens LH, Punt CJ, de Groot MR, Attard G, de Bono JS, Pierga JY, Terstappen LW (2013) Circulating tumor cells count and morphological features in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 8(6):e67148
Müller M, de Sena OI, Allner S, Ferstl S, Bidola P, Mechlem K, Fehringer A, Hehn L, Dierolf M, Achterhold K, Gleich B, Hammel JU, Jahn H, Mayer G, Pfeiffer F (2017) Myoanatomy of the velvet worm leg revealed by laboratory-based nanofocus X-ray source tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(47):12378–12383
Busse M, Müller M, Kimm MA, Ferstl S, Allner S, Achterhold K, Herzen J, Pfeiffer F (2018) Three-dimensional virtual histology enabled through cytoplasm-specific X-ray stain for microscopic and nanoscopic computed tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(10):2293–2298
Troschel FM, DiCorpo D, Griffin M, Mario J, Hariri LP, Shepard JA, Ott H, Wright CD, Muniappan A, Lanuti M, Michaelson J, Fintelmann FJ (2017) Perioperative 3-dimensional micro computed tomography of human surgical lung specimens: a pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195:A4903
Michaelson J, Satija S, Moore R, Weber G, Halpern E, Garland A, Kopans DB (2003) Estimates of the breast cancer growth rate and sojourn time from screening database information. J Women’s Imaging 5:3–10
Chen LL, Nolan M, Silverstein M, Mihm MV Jr, Sober AJ, Tanabe KK, Smith BL, Younger J, Michaelson JS (2009) The impact of primary tumor size, nodal status, and other prognostic factors on the risk of cancer death. Cancer 115(21):5071–5083
Milano DF et al (2016) Regulators of metastasis modulate the migratory response to cell contact under spatial confinement. Biophys J 110(8):1886–1895
Larrue A, Rattner A, Peter ZA, Olivier C, Laroche N, Vico L, Peyrin F (2011) Synchrotron radiation micro-CT at the micrometer scale for the analysis of the three-dimensional morphology of microcracks in human trabecular bone. PLoS ONE 6(7):e21297
Acknowledgements
Many thanks for equipment provided by Bruker Skyscan and Nikon Metrology, and funding provided by Nikon Metrology. Micro-CT imaging was also provided at the MIT Center for Bits and Atoms, 20 Ames Street. Cambridge, MA 02139. Many thanks to Drs. Barbara Smith and Michelle Gadd, and especially to Dr. Thomas Gudewicz for his gracious help with the pathological aspects of this work.
Funding
This study was funded in part by an unnumbered contract from Nikon Metrology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
James Michaelson was the PI on the unnumbered contract from Nikon Metrology. James Michaelson has received no speaker honoraria from any company, nor does he own any stock, nor is he a member of any committee related to this work. Otherwise, none of the authors had any has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 71999 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DiCorpo, D., Tiwari, A., Tang, R. et al. The role of Micro-CT in imaging breast cancer specimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 180, 343–357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05547-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05547-z